Modern Software Development Is Cancer

adecom By adecom April 21, 2021

These are predictable entities that get the job done. The root problem behind this is typically a lack of senior leadership. Hard-to-read code can slow your team down, particularly when engineers come and go. If an engineer comes in and can’t decipher code, you’ve suddenly got a big problem. This is when semicolons start to go missing from the code or code gets checked in without undergoing the required code review, leading to application crashes and bugs galore. Under-scoping is most often the cause of bugs during software development.

modern software development complex

Just to be clear, complexity and simplicity bear no intrinsic relation to the size of the code base. A large code base (Google’s is some 2 billion lines) need not be complex, and a small code base may not exhibit simplicity. Contact us and learn more about how we can deliver unmatched support for your design and development needs with our talented IDC team. It’s what sets us apart to help make your business better. We bring expertise to the table but thrive on learning about your business and adapting our process with yours.

The complexity we have built in today, especially microservices, containers and orchestration and ‘automation’ as far as the eye can see, are often things we have mistakenly thought we needed. Many people I’ve encountered think containers magically solved all deployment problems, and I have to point out that those images need to be maintained. Microservices might fit certain specific scenarios, but they add needless complexities. While the spec is ugly, it’s not particularly complex. The format itself is actually really easy to work with, being designed at a time when memory was at a premium. When I go to a restaurant, I don’t want to know what the staff is doing with my food.

Dashboards For Continuous Monitoring Of Quality For Software Product Under Development

The question arose as to whether to paginate the data. The engineers spent hours wondering how such formatting would work if a customer wanted to load the data all at once or if the internet disconnected. Another common example occurs in software menu systems. Rather than create menus that match how users think, designers derive ideas from internal business units and create menus accordingly, Buhle said. Confused users will fail to find critical functions when they need them.

In order to achieve simplicity, many times you have to renounce to use a nosql db, or the latest JS framework, or microservices, or the last hot language, or… Most times “the simpler approach to solve a problem” is boring for developers. So why do so many software companies ─ most of which are blessed with smart and industrious people whose livelihoods are vested in the success of their software ─ allow complexity to imperil the code base? Few executives recognize the cost of complexity because they don’t understand the nature of the products they’re selling. When you sell software, you’re actually selling a hybrid product-service with a very unique warranty (see inset A or B? below). The iterative model offers an alternative for software development that’s less focused on rigid documentation but provides room for constant revisions.

It has resisted efforts to improve it over the years by adding “features”. First is that experienced developers often hate these tools. Most Serious Developers™ like to write Real Software™ with Real Code™. I know that might sound like I’m pandering to a bunch of whiney babies , but if the core value you deliver is technology, it is rarely a good idea to adopt tools that your best developers don’t want to work with. That “Our Code” part ends up being enormously complex, since it mirrors the business and its processes. If we have custom business logic, and custom processes, then we are left to build the interfaces, workflow, and logic that make up our applications.

The firms choose the tools based on the project needed, not just blindly emulate whatever Apple did for their spaceship campus or whatever is the engineering marvel du jour. And so, software development is only more complex because we, as developers modern software development complex refuse to patron a barber-shoppe that uses scissors, brooms, razors, pen, and paper. But we, as an industry, force them into the latest-and-greatest because we have no interest in remembering the old ways, nor in maintaining them.

  • A bad developer will always find some way to break out of the cage or abuse their tools.
  • With large data sets, one can often find abundant data parallelism to be able to utilize massively parallel processors and allow application performance to grow with each generation of hardware that has more execution resources.
  • Cyber Cyber Passionate about stopping cyber attacks before they occur?
  • Lewis hopes ethics in machine learning would improve in order to identify how broad the bias is and the algorithmic consequences it could cause in the future.
  • Admins can use AWS CloudFormation templates and resource stacks to deploy an EC2 instance using an infrastructure-as-code …

We find out how containerised microservices and automated testing, combined with effective collaboration and communication, can drive innovation. Provides connections between IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management tools and 3rd party tools like Git, GitLib, and GitHub for managing version control of software. Managing configuration and defects to understand all the software artifacts and build distinct versions of the software. Establish quality assurance priorities and release criteria to address and track defects. Building a model with a modeling tool that uses a modeling language like SysML or UML to conduct early validation, prototyping and simulation of the design.

Complexity In Modern Software Development

We collaborate with you from the initial project estimation process, team & milestone planning, all the way through delivery. You will always have a voice in the process and we work hard to add expertise, focus and continuity with our team. Using the Dynamic Systems Model for small organizations is out of the question. Instead, it is a better fit for large organizations saddled by red-tapes, bottlenecks, and redundancies.

modern software development complex

These databases usually start out small and grow over time. Eventually, the central database becomes too important and too risky to change, in the company’s assessment. The IT team struggles to add newer technologies because they’re incompatible with the legacy data storage. Overly simplistic and rigid testing requirements introduce complexity in the software development process. To avoid these kinds of UI complexity, test products with real users. User acceptance testing is not always as easy as it sounds.

It requires interpersonal skills and a collaborative approach that is attuned to the context of use and the customer. We, as an industry, need to find ways to simplify the process of building software, without ignoring the legitimate complexities of businesses. We need to admit that not every application out there needs the same level of interface sophistication and operational scalability as Gmail.

Have A Projectfor Us?

The agile development methodology can also help to solve this problem. It is an iterative approach, where both development and testing activities are concurrent. Agile team tests alongside the software development team in order to ensure that the features are implemented during a particular iteration are done.

Good enough for home cooking it is, no doubt about that. When Unix came out, there was already a generation of computer programmers and computer users up-to-speed on RT-11/TOPS-10. The hierarchical directory structure of Unix was something that MS-DOS (2.0!) copied, badly, with consequences extending to the current Windows world.

RAD Studio is a Powerful IDE For Building Native Apps on Windows, Android, iOS, macOS and Linux. It enables you to design Beautiful Desktop and Mobile App UIs with less coding effort. Running your entire application out of a 10,000 line index.js file is a recipe for disaster, but going to the other end of the spectrum with 10,000 one-line files is also a bad idea.

The API supports any client and any server-side programming language, making it accessible to all. FinanceLayer is a real-time API for finance news that uses JSON payload to get the most dynamic financial data. You can get live finance news and article feeds on any website or application. As for optimization, don’t worry about optimizing all of your code. Keep in mind that an application generally spends 90% of its time running 10% of the code.

Basic Principles Of Modern Software Design

I remember numerous occasions when the scribes and the Parisees of IT said “one day we won’t need programmers”. We have complicated software development to the point that nobody knows what is going on, especially when it doesn’t work. And just when you get used to some technology or development tool, the fashion changes and business insists that you change to the latest, whether it is efficient or not. It is that kind of thought process and default overhead that is leading companies to conclude that software development is just too expensive. ” Sure, it can be, but not when you’re the person writing all ten microservices. It is that kind of additional complexity that is often so unnecessary.

You’ll need to keep your application up to date, but you won’t have to worry about a vendor deciding it isn’t worth their time to support you anymore. As Spotify scaled, it found that the approach that had powered its rapid growth was actually starting to slow it down. “The blessed or recommended tooling should be easily discoverable. There should be quality user instructions along the way. And, if users get stuck, where to get support should be obvious,” Niemen wrote. In contrast, with more mature industries, you have many tools an techniques.

modern software development complex

For businesses looking to stay at the forefront of all things digital, IoT is a leading choice. Today, full stack developers are combining their front and back-end knowledge with an expertise in IoT, connecting the dots between firmware systems, networking protocols, and sensors. Asking the question what is full stack development can help us understand related trends and the future surrounding this topic. In recent years, full-stack development has once again become critical, as it can be beneficial to a project to have at least one person with a holistic knowledge of its components.

Much of this reduction has been accomplished by making programming languages more expressive. Languages such as Python, Ruby, or JavaScript can take as little as one third as much code as C in order to implement similar functionality. C gave us similar advantages over writing in assembler. Looking forward to the future, it is unlikely that language design will give us the same kinds of improvements we have seen over the last few decades.


At Zibtek, many of our software development projects begin with engineers who are full stack developers. But at some point, the team grows to include engineers who specialize in either front-end or back-end disciplines. Software engineers apply engineering principles to build software and systems to solve problems.

Therefore, unit test code for TDD is usually written within the same project or module as the code being tested. Tests become part of the maintenance overhead of a project. Badly written tests, for example ones that include hard-coded error strings, are themselves prone to failure, and they are expensive to maintain. There is a risk that tests that regularly generate false failures will be ignored, so that when a real failure occurs, it may not be detected. It is possible to write tests for low and easy maintenance, for example by the reuse of error strings, and this should be a goal during the code refactoring phase described above. There are various aspects to using test-driven development, for example the principles of “keep it simple, stupid” and “You aren’t gonna need it” .


What I do care is that when I launch my browser, my PRIMAL NEEDS are satisfied. If a code change disrupts my usage model, it’s shitty code. I don’t care if someone needs to spend 100 years in a basement fixing this, it’s not my problem. If you’re wondering, what will happen is, Firefox will lose even more market share, because once extensions stop working, there will be even less incentive for loyal users to stay with a browser that is trying to ape Chrome. This is why you have a hundred pointless programming languages out there, which serve no higher purpose than to make whoever is writing a piece of software somewhere feel more comfortable in their chair. The user is a nuisance, and usage patterns are invented to justify software decisions.

They measure progress against clear performance indicators, and communicate with stakeholders and the cross-functional team that is building the product. Detailed, long-term plans for major, custom software projects have long been the norm in government. But, as software engineers and policy makers have learned over the years, those plans are never correct.

Time Management Is Difficult

He would always answer, “both.” He didn’t know how to choose, and he was afraid of making the wrong choice. So he asked me to implement both alternatives, and make the software configurable. He wanted to keep his options to change his mind later as often as he wanted to. Ideally they share conventions where appropriate to reduce the learning curve, but let each shine in its specialty.

While I do have my own ideas about what works best, ultimately the technology is situational to a certain extent. It just depends on what you are trying to achieve and the customer’s needs is ALWAYS the most important. Simplification is really the goal as I think most people would agree. Controlling costs should always be at the top of your list when building systems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.